Words do have meaning...

The thought strikes me that we no longer reverence language. Certainly many appreciate the marvelous way in which masters such as a Shakespeare can give new life to ordinary words, or how a poet such as a Dickinson, Browning or Yeats in their poetry can elevate language to the level of art. Nevertheless, it appears that we are all too ready to sit by as words are co-opted and contorted to express concepts that are counter to their actual meaning.
Witness how supporters describe the "ella drug" which was recently approved by the FDA. Supporters choose to describe this drug as contraceptive when in actuality the drug begins working days after conception. This is the "morning after" pill designed to be taken up to 120 hours (five days) after intercourse. The very description of the effects of this drug make it evident that it is an abortifacient, not a contraceptive. But the creative use of language makes it appear much more benign. (information here)
Perhaps we will get to the point that we allow infanticide to be termed "post-natal contraception."

Let's celebrate youth by exterminating some of them!

George Orwell grows in my estimation with each passing year. ZENIT reports today on the observation made by L'Osservatore Romano that the International year of youth that the United Nations began this month is becoming a forum to promote abortion.

"On UNFPA's Web page are several U.N. initiatives [...] oriented to the promotion of universal access to sexual and reproductive health services, language that, as is known, makes reference to contraception and abortion, as well as to the promotion of brazen sexual education," the Vatican newspaper explains.

"Distressing as well," the paper adds, is the fact that "in the provisional documents published before the preparatory conference that is being held in Leon, Mexico, from Aug. 23-27, no mention is made of the Convention for the Rights of Children."

"This document is certainly not perfect, but it stresses the basic rights and duties of parents to educate and raise their children," the article notes. Meanwhile in the draft statement of the preparatory conference, no mention is made of the terms "child" and "parents."

The Vatican daily characterized this report as manifesting a "radical conception of youthful autonomy, which seeks to break all bonds between parents and children."

"[T]o strike the heart of the family does not help young people," the article affirmed.

In opposition to this trend, L'Osservatore Romano suggested taking into account the Magna Carta of Values, presented at the United Nations on Aug. 13 by the World Youth Parliament.

Magna Carta of Values at World Youth Parliament site: www.wyparliament.org/index/

Unity lost when the Bishop is rejected...

The continuing saga of St. Stanislaus Kostka parish in St. Louis seems no closer to coming to an end. A story in the New York Times last week gives an update and overview on the long running dispute between a renegade congregation and the local ordinary. This entire episode serves to reinforce the importance of maintaining unity with the bishop in the local church.

The controversy, involving the control of the temporal goods of the parish, centered on whether the property and monetary assets would be controlled by a pastor appointed by the archbishop, which is the canonical norm, or by a lay board of directors. The controversy began under Cardinal John J. Glennon and continued under Cardinal Joseph Ritter, Archbishop John L. May, Cardinal Justin Rigali and continued under Archbishop Emeritus Raymond Leo Burke.

After Archbishop Burke removed the priests from the parish, the lay board sought their own priest and convinced Fr. Marek Bozek to leave his diocese of Springfield-Cape Girardeau without the permission of his ordinary. Fr. Bozek incurred excommunication for creating a schism and was laicized. The lay board members also incurred the penalty of excommunication.

But the story keeps getting better. After the Vatican upheld the actions of Archbishop Burke in announcing the excommunications and in suppressing the parish, the members of the lay board reconciled themselves fully to the Catholic Church. However, Mr. (formerly Fr.) Bozek installed a new lay board and continues to hold services.

It seems that Fr. Bozek has an agenda of his own in calling for the ordination of women to the priesthood, dropping of celibacy, and opening priesthood to practicing homosexuals. Most of the former parishioners have left St. Stan's, but Bozek apparently has attracted a sufficient number of new "progressive" congregants that a proposed settlement with the Archdiocese was rejected by a vote of 257 to 185. It should be noted that those former parishioners who chose to not support the now laicized Bozek and went to other Catholic Churches, were not allowed to vote.

One can follow the rather dizzying trail of this story on the web site of the Archdiocese and the numerous statements and articles archived thereon. (link here) It is a sad and painful tale that is still unfolding. Pray for the people of St. Stanislaus Kostka.

No free market for monks...

It strikes me as strange that Benedictine monks would have to go to federal court in order to be allowed to sell the caskets that they make, but that is apparently the case in Louisiana. (story here)
I am familiar with caskets made by other monastic communities such as at St. Meinrad, Indiana, the Trappists at New Melleray, Iowa, and by the Benedictines monks of the Holy Cross in Chicago (www.monsterycaskets.com). I have admired the simple elegance of these caskets when I have seen them used in services and have appreciated that these represent a reasonably priced option for families who are often taken advantage of during a time of grief.
It seems that funeral directors in Louisiana were willing to act as a clearing house for sale of the caskets, but they wanted to buy the caskets for half of the $1,500 to $2,000 charged by the monks and then tack on $1,000 for their effort. I fail to see what interest that State of Louisiana has in requiring that caskets be sold only by licensed funeral directors -- particularly as their laws do not require that a casket be purchased at all. Perhaps it is just the interest of the legislators who wish to benefit from the financial support of the funeral industry.

Now let us continue to go forward...

I was pleased to see that attorney William McMurry who has made a living pursuing sexual abuse charges against priests has decided to drop his lawsuit against the Vatican and the Pope. I acknowledge that Mr. McMurry has helped bring a modicum of justice to some legitimate victims but have felt that he was over zealous at times in his quest for clients.
Now that we are saved the distraction of this particular law suit, there is an opportunity to increase the efforts we are putting forth in seeking assistance for victims and in assuring that policies and procedures are in effect at each of our parishes and schools to prevent future instances of abuse.
The problem of child sexual abuse is a societal problem and not merely a Catholic issue. I am proud of the steps that have been taken by dioceses across the nation in recent years to educate people about the issue of sexual abuse, to provide them with the tools to become more effective protectors of children and to assure the safety of children in our churches and schools. We now have a chance to step up those efforts and provide a model for public schools and institutions whose issues with the same problem has long been ignored.

Excommunicate her? Don't bother, she has already left.

Judge Sheila O'Brien published an op ed piece in today's Chicago Tribune which definitely caught my attention. (article here). In short, she lambastes the Catholic Church with unsubstantiated allegations, manufactured arguments, and ad hominem arguments. When she states, "We have waited for the civil authorities to empanel grand juries and bring indictments, but that has not happened," I wonder why as a sitting judge she hasn't done anything? She accuses the Church of protecting pedophiles but fails to cite a single instance. She claims the "hierarchy" will not open their books so they can see where the money goes, so I assume she has never reviewed the reports issued by the Archdiocese in which she resides which are available on line and published in the Archdiocesan paper.
Her piece is entitled, "Excommunicate me please!" I can only assume she lacks the courage of her apparent convictions.